ext_85959 ([identity profile] admiral-j.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] algeh 2002-07-24 12:08 pm (UTC)

Re: Battle Hunter

It is true that the simplicity of the Battle Hunter engine and the campiness of its badly-translated dialogue represents a lot of the game's amusement value. It succeeds in being much more fun than games three or five times its price and complexity, and for no immediately apparent reason. I would certainly try to maintain as much of the game's flavor as possible in a roleplaying campaign, but you are right -- it would be difficult.

I find the setting to be the most _compelling_ thing about the game, however -- you can't see your hunter's surroundings in the game due to graphical limitations, but I imagine an underground maze where you can drop through a manhole and find yourself on the 36th floor of a buried office building, and where the door to the office you find yourself in leads into the third car of a subway train suspended in the dirt, brick, and steel. The concept of post-apocalyptic scavengers trading "artifacts" for cash is nothing new -- it's the potential for unique location development -- the premise of the massive conglomerate "Dungeon" lying beneath the city -- that really draws me to the idea as a gamemaster.

And I have to agree -- I don't think I could have eaten more than one of those eggs. They sound _tough_.


--Azzy

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org